Dr. Matthew Johnson: I'm telling the truth about the SOHA portal.

depiction of guardians of an inter-dimensional portal 

John [Carlson] and Adam [Davies] accidentally triggered and opened up a portal. Out of the portal came about 3 foot tall, two of them, guardians of the portal." --Dr. Matthew Johnson; TeamSquatchinUSA.com

I define Dr. Matthew Johnson's Bigfoot chapters in three phases. The Encounter, Cloaking Revealed, and The Portal.

PHASE 1: The Encounter | July 2000

Dr. Matthew Johnson's Bigfoot history begins at Oregon Caves National Park in Southern Oregon on July 1st 2000. You can read his a detailed BFRO report of his encounter. Here's the very short version. After exiting a cave, Dr. Johnson was with his family when he was alerted by a foul smell and loud vocalizations. After walking away from his family to take care of "business" he scanned downhill towards them and saw a Bigfoot. If you have ever heard Dr. Johnson recall this story in person, he gets very emotional at this point. This is the point where he expresses his concern for his family's safety. 

The encounter was huge bigfoot news for the mainstream media and went viral, probably because of the embedded irony that Dr. Matthew Johnson was a psychologist telling a story that sounds nuts to the general public. He went on to do several national media interviews and kept to this non-paranormal version.

PHASE 2: 2011 Cloaking Revealed | June 2011

Fast-forward to 11 years later when Dr. Johnson had a conversation with only four people present. The conversation would be a milestone in the retelling of the Oregon Cave encounter.

Dr. Johnson was a guest speaker at Toby Johnson's (no relation) Sasquatch Symposium. Paranormal researcher Thom Powell was also in attendance as another guest speaker. A conversation between the two of them would reveal a huge detail missing from Dr. Johnson's retelling of his Oregon Cave encounter. The missing detail? The Bigfoot in Matthew Johnson's encounter had the ability to cloak.

PHASE 3: The Portal | June 2014
After years of keeping his Southern Oregon Habituation Area (SOHA) to himself, Dr. Matthew Johnson began to invite hand-picked researchers to his bigfoot habituation site. In June of 2014, Adam Davies and John Carlson were among the exclusive researchers allowed to camp at SOHA and what they encountered still defies explanation, although Dr. Matthew Johnson tried at his conference. At the conference Dr. Johnson talked about visible portals to other dimensions and half-sized bigfoots with glowing eyes.

The audio clip below is Bigfoot news and goes at a quick pace and is worth listening too.



You can learn more about the encounter and several other Dr. Matthew Johnson links below

• Dr. J's SOHA portal announcement
• Audio Recordings from Southern Oregon Habituation Area
• Dr. J’s Bigfoot 2000 Oregon Cave BFRO Report

Jack Link's Sasquatch + Sports Illustrated = Hilarious

Jack Link's Sasquatch is off to a rough start at Football Camp 

"We don't know if his raw strength will translate into football ball ability, but one thing is for sure he does not like being indoors." --Boomer Esiason; Sports Illustrated

In the latest Bigfoot news Jack Link's  has teamed up with Sports Illustrated to create same hilarious co-branded videos. There are a total of four videos so far. Scroll down and check them all out.

Meet The League's Newest Prospect: Sasquatch
He's traded in the forest for the field – football field, that is. He's oozing with potential (among other things), and he doesn't know the meaning of the word "quit," or any other word for that matter. Watch to see why Sasquatch is the WILD player we need in our football lives.



Sasquatch is Football's Next Star
Sasquatch has seriously WILD skills, but can he be trained? Can the staff find a big enough helmet? And will he ever stop trying to chew on the football? Does he think it's a big brown egg? Check out Sasquatch as he takes the field for the first time ever.


Sasquatch In Action On His Third Day Of Practice
Watch Sasquatch try to work his way through football drills and find his WILDEST position on the field.


Sasquatch Found An Unlikely Man-Beast Mentor: Clay Matthews
Sasquatch may not have much in the way of skills, but he's definitely good at one thing: hitting offensive players. Hard.



Connect with Jack Link's: 
http://www.jacklinks.com
http://www.twitter.com/jacklinks
http://www.facebook.com/jacklinksbeef...
http://www.instagram.com/jacklinksjerky

The Patterson/Gimlin Bigfoot Film is Evidence for Skeptics, not Advocates

Phillip Morris and Bob Heironymous with Bigfoot Costume

"At the end of the day, there’s just too much dirt surrounding the Patterson film to use it as any reliable source for debate about the existence of Bigfoot..." --Micah Hanks; Mysterious Universe

In an article for MysteriousUniverse.org, Micah Hanks revisits the Patterson/Gimlin film after a new stabilization is offered on Reddit. The thread on Reddit uses the new stabilization to argue the weakness of the P/G film as evidence. While Mr. Hanks believes the snew stabilization does not offer anything new to either side of the argument, he does have issues of using the P/G Film as the Holy Grail of Bigfoot evidence.

(New stabilization from Reddit User)

His issues with the film are mostly based on John Napiers concerns with Patty's Anatomy (for those uninitiated, Patty is the name affectionately given to the subject in the P/G film), Read one of Napier's arguments presented by Mr. Hanks below.

For starters, the creature displays a sagittal crest atop it’s skull; however, the subject also, rather famously, appears to possess female mammary glands (breasts). Among the great apes, we have the sagittal formation that occasionally appears, primarily among the male members of the species (gorillas and orangutans), rather the females. Hence, it seems rather out of place that the prominence on “Patty’s” head so greatly resembles a sagittal crest formation, since “she” would be the least likely of the sexes to possess this trait.

There can be an argument made that the sagittal crest is not a marker of gender, and more of an indication of vegetation-chewing diet. There are multiple examples of modern and relict female primates that have sagittal crests. Female Paranthropus also had sagittal crests. Mr h

Mr. Hanks also draws attention to Napier's critique of Patty's belly--or lack there of. The argument is if patty has a the diet that comes with a sagittal crest than she should also have the large intestinal track or belly that come with it. These arguments about Patty's anatomy can go back and forth forever. Which perhaps underlines Mr. Hanks premise. His final argument about mismatched data does get interesting.

Finally, the individual footprint length used to estimate relative height of the purported animal, matched to the distance between tracks left in the sand (which were measured at the scene of the purported observation at Bluff Creek) are inconsistent with the proportional ratio for expected stride. Primatologists, like Napier, who observed the film have pointed this out, although it remains one of the least-discussed aspects of the the film’s investigation which argues strongly against the animal in the film being genuine. To this, he noted in his 1972 book Bigfoot that the manner in which the subject appears to walk in the film looks very exaggerated: “All three factors should be consistent with each other. Could it be that the ‘exaggerated’ walk of Bigfoot was designed to magnify the normal step length, an effect which, in the event, failed miserably?”

It would be interesting to see anybody take on this final argument of the mismatch of data. head over to the MysteriousUniverse.org website and read Micah Hanks entire article titled, "Maybe It’s Time We Forget About The Patterson Bigfoot Film".